"I don't get my authority from this preexisting paradigm which is quite narrow and only serves a few people," Russell responded. "I look elsewhere for alternatives that might be of service to humanity."
And with that, the first shots of Russell's revolutionary interview were fired.
Over the course of the following ten-or-so minutes, Brand and Paxo volleyed back and forth over subjects ranging from political apathy, to corporate greed, to gorgeous beards.
Throughout the interview, Brand repeatedly dodged Paxman's efforts to trivialize his message — at one point Paxman literally called Brand a "very trivial man" — until finally, even the entrenched newsman appeared to relent against the rushing tide of Brand's valid arguments.
After Brand reminded Paxman that he cried after learning that his grandma too had been "fucked over" by aristocrats, the Newsnight host was stunned into silence.
"If we can engage that feeling and change things, why wouldn't we?" Brand crescendoed. "Why is that naive? Why is that not my right because I'm an 'actor'? I've taken the right. I don't need the right from you. I don't need the right from anybody. I'm taking it."
I'm not his biggest fan, but he has some serious valid points.
Personally, I don't agree with him on not voting. It only makes it easier for all these horrible politicians get their way. But, I think the better route is to vote BUT still keep in connection with the idea that this system isn't working. There does need to be a revolution. Communism looked great on paper. So does Democracy. But the reason why the U.S. and etc brand Communism as bad, is because there are too much corruption. It hasn't worked at all due to the corruption and selfishness of the politicians. How is Democracy any different? It isn't helping the people. It only helps the 1%. How is that Democracy?
Either way. He makes valid points.
Baby Groot
Posts : 2751 Kudos : 60 Join date : 2010-11-07 Age : 37 Location : The Milano